Hey wasbappin, You do realize your effectively advocating the return to the foreign and domestic policies of the mid-1990s to mid-2000s. The reason those policies were unpopular was because only the boomers liked those policies.
This is especially true after 9/11; you criticize anti-war young people. However, Millennials are younger are NOT anti-war on principle like boomer anti-war people were. The wars were initially extremely popular; what happened was by 2004 it became obvious that the Bush administration would send in our troops with one arm tied behind their backs militarily. Thus Many Gen-Xers and millennials turned against the wars because they were not being conducted in accordance to the younger cohorts generational nature.
The Boomer administrations imposed nonsensical rules of engagement which meant that US forces whenever they were in a situation in which they had to choose between taking losses and shielding iraqi noncombatants/avoiding collateral damage: on these occasion the troops were ordered to avoid collateral damage at all costs. When terrorist insurgents without uniform ambushed and inflicted killed or wounded casualties ( a war crime under the Geneva convention by the way) US troops were forbidden to execute mass reprisals.
We millennials don't care about shielding enemy noncombatants OR about liberal dissidents from the terrorist states nor do we care all that much about non-americans and non-westerners killed by terrorists states or terrorist proxies. What we DO care about are the westerners killed by the terror regimes and the terror regime's anti-western campaign. Our Ideal war on terror would be Mongol/barbarossa-style invasion of Iran with the strategic diplomatic objective of compelling the Mullahs to accept coexistence with the west with the military objective of inflicting generational punitive devastation upon Iran.
The ideal wrapping up of said war would consist of something along the lines of a defeated Iranian Ayatollah appearing as a supplicant at US/coalition supreme HQ and signing a capitulation acknowledging he was wrong to underestimate our military capabilities and our ruthlessness ability. An Iranian supreme ayatollah signing a 50-years peace document in writing followed by our forces reclaiming and then dynamiting the old embassy (the one vacated in 1979) and also looting anything we find worthwhile and destroying the oil fields (iranian oil has no value for the US economy and is direct competition for our OPEC allies as well).
Our Forces would just go in, kill the enemy, destroy everything in our path and/or anything we feel like destroying, secure the enemy capitulation, then leave. No nation building, no regime change, no nonsense about "liberalism", the war would be about punishing and avenging terrorist outrages against US national honor and military honor.
Lol you are such a sad little boy. Keep categorizing all the ways you are always right and everyone else is wrong. They definitely don’t read like the diaries of a mad man who has a hatred of women and anyone who disagrees with him. Maybe go to school for some of these things if you care so much. Or better yet, maybe go get a job before looking down your nose at American workers. You are just an angry little boy who refuses to work. A Charlie Kirk in the making. Your pitiable life is matched only be your sheer stupidity. Have fun being a joke for the rest of your life. Hopefully one day you can get a girlfriend.
Hey wasbappin, You do realize your effectively advocating the return to the foreign and domestic policies of the mid-1990s to mid-2000s. The reason those policies were unpopular was because only the boomers liked those policies.
This is especially true after 9/11; you criticize anti-war young people. However, Millennials are younger are NOT anti-war on principle like boomer anti-war people were. The wars were initially extremely popular; what happened was by 2004 it became obvious that the Bush administration would send in our troops with one arm tied behind their backs militarily. Thus Many Gen-Xers and millennials turned against the wars because they were not being conducted in accordance to the younger cohorts generational nature.
The Boomer administrations imposed nonsensical rules of engagement which meant that US forces whenever they were in a situation in which they had to choose between taking losses and shielding iraqi noncombatants/avoiding collateral damage: on these occasion the troops were ordered to avoid collateral damage at all costs. When terrorist insurgents without uniform ambushed and inflicted killed or wounded casualties ( a war crime under the Geneva convention by the way) US troops were forbidden to execute mass reprisals.
We millennials don't care about shielding enemy noncombatants OR about liberal dissidents from the terrorist states nor do we care all that much about non-americans and non-westerners killed by terrorists states or terrorist proxies. What we DO care about are the westerners killed by the terror regimes and the terror regime's anti-western campaign. Our Ideal war on terror would be Mongol/barbarossa-style invasion of Iran with the strategic diplomatic objective of compelling the Mullahs to accept coexistence with the west with the military objective of inflicting generational punitive devastation upon Iran.
The ideal wrapping up of said war would consist of something along the lines of a defeated Iranian Ayatollah appearing as a supplicant at US/coalition supreme HQ and signing a capitulation acknowledging he was wrong to underestimate our military capabilities and our ruthlessness ability. An Iranian supreme ayatollah signing a 50-years peace document in writing followed by our forces reclaiming and then dynamiting the old embassy (the one vacated in 1979) and also looting anything we find worthwhile and destroying the oil fields (iranian oil has no value for the US economy and is direct competition for our OPEC allies as well).
Our Forces would just go in, kill the enemy, destroy everything in our path and/or anything we feel like destroying, secure the enemy capitulation, then leave. No nation building, no regime change, no nonsense about "liberalism", the war would be about punishing and avenging terrorist outrages against US national honor and military honor.
This turned up in my Spam folder for some reason, you might want to look into that.
wasbappin have you shit your pants yet, it's very important for me to know if you've shit your pants.
oh hey, i guess you found something else to unhealthily tie your sense of self to
(fun fact: most Afghans regardless of political affiliation dislike Israel)
When you look into the mirror do you see Woodrow Wilson staring back at you?
Lol you are such a sad little boy. Keep categorizing all the ways you are always right and everyone else is wrong. They definitely don’t read like the diaries of a mad man who has a hatred of women and anyone who disagrees with him. Maybe go to school for some of these things if you care so much. Or better yet, maybe go get a job before looking down your nose at American workers. You are just an angry little boy who refuses to work. A Charlie Kirk in the making. Your pitiable life is matched only be your sheer stupidity. Have fun being a joke for the rest of your life. Hopefully one day you can get a girlfriend.
Xi's abolition of Amerikkka and repatriation of yakubians (🤮) sounds good to me my son. Hopefully Xi leads to China returning to hyperpower status.
imaging writing this lmao L
What the fuck was all of this