Yes to Nuclear War!

Launch against the vatnik entity, Joemala - we are ready!

Today, homo axis threatens to march on the master race of free humans in Ukraine under the cover of nuclear strikes. Yet some well-meaning free humans hesitate at the thought of nuclear retaliation, or, as we advocate, a first strike against the Axis.

This is where our movement can do the most to prepare the way for the Great Trial. We see through seventy years of fascist propaganda about nuclear weapons and understand their true nature. Quite literally, they are little more than hot air.

History itself proves this. Did anyone in Hiroshima expect an attack on the morning of August 6? No. That’s why so many fascists’ negatives are burned onto its walls.

The strikes on Hiroshima and Nagasaki are not accurate representations of nuclear war. This is why fascists have seized them to frighten us from the path of liberation.

Thus, we know nuclear weapons are only dangerous if they catch us by surprise.

If nuclear weapons were such truly world-ending weapons, how would big rocks or white kimonos be enough to block or deflect their power? How are we alive today if over a thousand nuclear weapons were detonated across the Cold War?

In fact, the peculiarities of Japanese construction ensured that Hiroshima and Nagasaki would be successful nuclear attacks. Even so, the attack on Nagasaki was notoriously interrupted by a mountain, which shielded much of the target area.

There is a RAND study from the 1980s that explains it would take only four years for us to recover from a full-scale nuclear war. With our modern economies, a recovery would be exponentially faster. A reflection upon the facts shows why.

Rather than Japan’s matchstick construction, today’s homes are built to withstand hurricanes and earthquakes. Double-pane windows and “sustainable” materials keep homes insulated and protect against high winds and debris. Modern filtration can remove 99.995% of all particulates from indoor air. Reinforced concrete is the norm for larger buildings. Many contain backup power generation and at least one stairwell.

The list of features that enable greater modern buildings to better survive nuclear attacks is endless. Today’s cities are the greatest fortresses of all-time.

And again, the very nuclear attacks used to scare us prove this. At the epicenter of Hiroshima stand the ruins of the Product Exhibition Hall. Note the construction - even at the center of the blast, Little Boy wasn’t strong enough to vaporize the building as the fascist propagandists would have us believe should happen.

Few buildings in Hiroshima were constructed so durably - but what if they all were, like today’s cities (with even newer, stronger materials and construction techniques decades more advanced than those present in 1940s Japan)?

For most people indoors, a nuclear strike will be no worse than a sudden rainstorm.

In fact, we would be more concerned to be caught in a conventional artillery strike than a nuclear one, because fast-moving pieces of metal are harder to dodge or block than some wind, heat, light, or ponderous clouds of (only briefly dangerous) dust.

The great danger nuclear weapons present is actually their sonic destruction. At most, soundproofing technology can only block around 50 decibels of noise. Some lower-frequency waves cannot be stopped and may still cause hearing damage in the event of an attack. I have yet to devise a countermeasure to nuclear-induced hearing damage.

Yet even with these facts in mind, many of those willing, in principle, to launch a first strike often hesitate to commit to one due to misplaced concerns about radiation. Decolonizing this space from fascist influence is of vital importance - no, we don’t need to “watch ‘Threads’.”

Within 48 hours of a nuclear strike, the most dangerous radiation will have subsided. In fact, in just a few hours after an attack, any immediate dangers to human health from radiation will have long since decayed, allowing for short-term outside trips. Within two weeks, radiation should fall to approximately background levels.

While we may expect some elevated long-term cancer risk for affected populations after a nuclear strike, we can expect a slew of new therapies to treat it in the future. We may even see complete cures for cancer come online in the next few years. The human body is simply far more resilient than the fascifists want us to believe.

Today’s supply chains are also supremely resilient, as their reaction to the CCP’s ongoing global biological attack (even a natural origin of the coronavirus conforms with this understanding, as the CPC took every step to ensure the virus spread globally) demonstrate. We are simply too materially endowed to suffer a catastrophic civilizational collapse after a nuclear strike, even on localized levels.

However, the above information only applies in the event of a successful Axis counterstrike to our first move, which isn’t even guaranteed. Do we really believe that russoid missile operators didn’t strip the wiring of their weapons or sell off the fuel? Or that Eurasia’s newly-minted warlords after a first strike by us so easily part with their new arsenals rather than use them as protection from one another?

This peculiar hesitance by the Axis or its remnants to go fully nuclear confirms our approach. These are regimes that cannot coexist with us, yet we try. The Axis must continuously attempt to destroy democratic world to ensure their long-term survival. The democratic world does not, by its internal mechanics, need to destroy the Axis.

So why don’t they launch a first strike against us?

Antifascism did not exist until 1945. Only atomic power granted us the ability to transcend the reality of fascism, because fascism does not exist in the heart of the sun.

A nuclear war would open the gates to a new reality. The Axis is inherently regressive. They cannot pass through to this new reality; they are forever trapped in this one. They seek to trap us, as well. Hence, they will not open the gate to that world. We can.

There is much written as to why agrarian imperial systems were the first communist societies. It is all wrong. Marx never gained the perspective to understand that the ideal system he described was dystopic. The economic and political conditions of the r*ssian empire were the only and exact ones under which a Marxist system could flourish - hence the later differences of implementation in China, whose former empire had maintained different restrictor plates on human potential.

The Axis today must induce sclerosis wherever possible, just as Europe’s old continental reactionary powers did in the 19th century. Thus, for them, a first strike, which would lead to uncontrollable, revolutionary changes, is off the table.

However, as free humans (who can only exist in such uncontrolled environments), the way to a first strike is open and unobstructed, save for fascist propaganda and the bloc of “honorable” “anti-fascists,” who always seem to support the Axis in one way or another - typically by Armenianism, which claimed another spectacular victory today, or by anti-Israel positioning, which, aside from being rooted in fascist propaganda (Israel has been fighting the Axis for nearly a decade in Syria, and is partly why a sizable portion of the fleet of tanks Ukrainians love to boast about creating at the Kharkiv plant were destroyed and not sent back to Ukraine), always accompanies some form of russophilia - no matter how seemingly-innocuous.

And as we are ultimately the ones who can set the tempo of nuclear attacks, we can launch a first strike at our leisure. Thus, we can avoid falling victim to any surprise attack, rendering the Axis’ nuclear arsenals, should they even work, inert.

So have no fear should the Axis turn to its own nuclear arsenal. The power of the escalation spiral, the Axis sigil which trapped us Titans in Tartarus for so long, fails by the day. No amount of blood sacrifices will restore it.

All we must do is continue to bash against the gate until finally we break free from our prison and liberate the world.