Banned From Pelosi's Zoom Call
Has Speaker Pelosi defected to the Axis?
On Tuesday, February 8, 2022, I attended Speaker Pelosi’s Weekly Grassroots Volunteer Update: Power and Diplomacy.
When I received the invitation, I knew it could change the fate of the world.
Little did I know just how it would.
Those who know me also know that I have always held Speaker Pelosi in high regard. Her decision to support airstrikes against Assad in 2013 and marshal the House to vote for them in the face of Republican sabotage and the first stirrings of woke Axis Democrats told me that she knew the meaning of that moment. I believed she knew the threat of the Axis, despite her “progressive” background, and would eventually help to mobilize forces against them in aid of our movement.
I now have stark evidence that fundamentally undermines this thesis.
A double-header featuring Representative Gregory Meeks, a supposed “hawk” (my expectations were low, as there are no real “hawks” outside of our movement), I still expected to hear the two outline the threat of the Axis given the immediate threat against Ukraine and constant Russian airstrikes against Free Syria. Given their background and the (presumed) smaller size of the Zoom call, I believed the two would strike a more militant tone in private.
The call was over Zoom started at 5:00 P.M. PST. I showed up approximately fifteen to twenty minutes late. Yet I have no reason to believe that any of this militancy was present in what I missed. In fact, if anything, their discussion was even worse than what has been stated publicly by Democrats on the looming Axis offensive.
Upon entering the Zoom call the call, I immediately looked to the chat and saw that only one comment had been posted since I joined. I was presented with a low-volume live chat facing the third-most powerful person in the United States.
The winds were to my back.
Cognizant of the diplomacy fetishism that defines public discourse on Russia, I set about to inject our movement’s absolute militancy into what I presumed was a receptive if naive audience.
I was utterly wrong. The discussion was entirely divorced from reality - aside from vague assurances that the United States would “stand by” Ukraine, it appears the highest echelons of the most advanced wing of the Democratic Party are even more severe diplomacy fetishists than the State Department’s Biden Boys.
Speaker Pelosi and Representative Meeks were talking about January 6th. I stated that only military force would stop Russia and that speaking about January 6th was pointless if we simply let Russia take Ukraine. The first commenter was supportive - I followed up with more exhortations to militantly resist Russia, but then a strange set of almost astroturfed blind cheerleading comments appeared which were made in support of the fantasy world Pelosi and Meeks constructed, in which all you have to do is go up and firmly shake Vladimir Putin’s hand and tell him to back off, bucko.
I monitored Pelosi and Meeks for any signs they were reading the comments. While Meeks simply looked directly at the camera, Pelosi’s head tended to wander, indicating to me she just might be checking on the comments as they came in.
The topic of sanctions came up, which are the nuclear option in the liberal (now entirely leftist, aka rightist) mindscape. I informed the audience - and Speaker Pelosi - that sanctions do not do anything and are simply rolled out as ersatz “solutions” so we don’t meaningfully confront the Axis.
I told the audience of the 2018 Battle of Khasham, during which US forces annihilated a force of Russian mercenaries, checking their attempts to seize northeastern Syria for a year. This did not lead to WW3 (not that we should fear or avoid it) and was hurriedly swept under the carpet by Russia’s MFA.
Did this open the liberal mind to the reality of their situation? No. Instead, there was more cheerleading. More clapping. More Go Blue Team.
Undeterred, I continued posting. The discussion turned to the farce of “vaccine diplomacy” - more Diplomacy, the liberal balm against all reaction. I stayed on-topic and said that a new Axis offensive against Ukraine would mean the end of American hegemony and the entire order they believed their vaccine giveaways were preserving.
No one engaged with these points because liberals are always trying to be accepted by the communists who want them dead. As a reminder, all communists are merely proto-national socialists. The terminus of all communism is national socialism because the avant-garde wing can never sustain itself in such a totalizing environment. Communist movements are always centered on a chauvinist racial group which then casts their racial enemies as counterrevolutionaries behind classist language.
The discussion briefly shifted to “equity,” one of the most reliable Axis Trojan horses. I informed them that equity was misdirection meant to protect the Axis according to the same mechanisms that sanctions are presented as meaningful action. Putin is one of if not the richest man in the world and all we hear about are Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk.
By now, Speaker Pelosi’s head had angled itself toward the screen so much I believed she could see the comments and was reading them as they came in. There was now a much higher volume of comments rolling in, but I was still responsible for approximately 1/4th them.
Finally, the decisive point of the call began. The discussion of “equity” segued to Speaker Pelosi answering a question - what would she do if she had one wish to change the world? She smiled and slowly said that she would give women education.
I responded to this by informing Speaker Pelosi and the audience that educating women in Afghanistan didn’t stop the Taliban from going door to door and murdering them, unlike what all liberals promised.
Speaker Pelosi then gave an expression that was, for lack of a better term, salty. Exceedingly so. She pursed her lips and turned her head, appearing to keep her eye on a single point on the screen.
As I was about to explain how all environmentalism is a fascist plot, as not a single “environmentalist” mobilized against Nord Stream II (or Russia’s environmentally destructive build-up and exercises near Ukraine, nevermind the environmental devastation wrought by the Assad regime or everyone’s favorite Aryanist fascist-allied ecofeminist municipal anarchists of '“Rojava”), unlike how they laid siege to Keystone XL (nevermind how the entire “antiwar” "movement is fascist, as it is entirely absent from stopping Russia’s incoming offensive against Ukrainian democracy but mobilized globally to keep Saddam Hussein’s Ba’athist regime in power), suddenly, and without warning, I was banned from the chat.
I sat in shock, my mouth slightly agape. The Twitter-brained Warrenista staffers got me. As I had feared, they had throughly compromised the highest levels of the Democratic Party. To sign up for the Zoom call, the only social media which was asked of you was a Twitter account.
I tried to rejoin the call, this time providing my email, believing I could still get in as I used that to originally sign up. Yet it was to no avail. The sole anti-Axis voice in this Democratic space had been silenced by the giggling fascists who make Bana jokes on Twitter.
So now we know. The worst-case scenario appears to be true. While Speaker Pelosi is a disciplinarian, I cannot think of how removing me from that group in any way serves her purposes if she truly opposes the Axis given the discourse until that point.
With the full Bernie-Warrenification (truly, an Obamafication) of the Democratic Party, military solutions, not even against reaction, but in and of themselves, do not exist in the liberal (now leftist, aka rightist) mind, only economic ones. To leftists, and now all liberals, it’s all about the Benjamins (which also explains growing Dem P*lestinianism, even as Israel secured the greatest victory of the Civil Rights era). By this “progressive” alchemy, Global Vaccines and Talking to Putin means America Is Back.
This leftification is terminal and there is no institutional check against it within the Democratic Party. Meisnerist Biden boosters, paid and otherwise, cope-hawks who think more people subtweeting Assad means things are getting better, NFT-peddling Thorneist-Warrenists (respect the grindset!), KHivers and Alt-Centrists who think dunking on the same people from 2016 is foreign policy, and Bernie-Warrenistas all work toward the same goal despite their infighting - the preservation of the Axis and the suppression of truly radical voices and solutions to the global fascism problem.